Stormswept (1995) from Tuna
|Stormswept (1995) doesn't know if it wants
to be a nudie flick, a soft-core or a horror slasher, but
it definitely tries to be really bad film making, and
almost succeeds at that.
it is not bad enough to ever become a cult classic.
Despite lots of visible boom mikes, continuity errors and
really bad acting, it doesn't ever reach the lofty
heights of an Ed Wood film.
is unusual for a pseudo-softcore erotica in that
there is no pubic exposure. Several women bare
their breasts often.
if you can call it that, involves three actresses, a
director, a random male crew member, a female real estate
agent, and an unexplained couple all trapped inside an
anti-bellum mansion by a heavy rain. The unexplained
couple have been living there in the basement, the real
estate agent attended a party at the place in her youth
and witnessed a murder, Two of the actresses have rented
the place for a vacation, and everyone else kind of hung
around hoping to get laid and got caught by the storm.
DVD info from Amazon.
transfer is dark, out of focus, and grainy
(roughly VHS quality), and there are no extra
features of note
We have lots of
boobs, a few buns (male and female) hetero sex, lesbian
sex, and a spontaneous female orgasm under hypnosis. 20
IMDB readers have it at 5.2/10. It looks like 6 of the
cast and crew voted to get it that high. The three people
who have commented say:
2) This movie doesn't know if it wants to be a psycho
slasher thing, or a ghost story, or a soft core party,
and ends up being none of them.
3) A waste of space at the rental store. It would have to
get better to be bad.
I give this a solid 0
With their votes ... IMDB summary: 5.2 out of 10.
As noted above, the correct score is
about 3.5, but the average has been
skewed by the fact that a very small
number of votes obviously includes five
or six people who worked on the film.
more accurate stat: Men aged 30-44 scored it
1.9!!! And that high probably only because of
the Movie House home page