The Sheltering Sky (1990) from Johnny Web (Uncle Scoopy; Greg Wroblewski) and Tuna

Each one of us has been formed from DNA broth, but the final soup has been spiced so heavily by cultural influences that the original broth is barely recognizeable, Many intellectuals, particularly idle American ones, have wondered hypothetically what it would be like if they could free themselves from their cultural assumptions, hoping to isolate the intrinsic person beneath.

This is the story of two such people, a couple named Kit and Port Moresby (Port Moresby, get it? It's the capital of Papua New Guinea, and the very symbol of a truly exotic port of call). It takes place in the period immediately following World War 2, when Americans were quite welcome in North Africa. Kit and Port saw North Africa as the perfect place to break away from the assumptions of Euro-centric Christian culture. They immersed themselves in the local culture, learned to communicate in the local languages, learned to live as the natives lived, without Western hotels or restaurants. They hoped not only to discover their intrinsic selves, but also to rediscover their connection to each other. They gradually sought purer experiences, eventually fleeing the last vestiges of civilization as we know it, making their way deep into the Sahara.

NUDITY REPORT

Debra Winger shows all of her body, in several scenes. (There is only a fleeting look at her breasts, but many views of her crotch and her bottom)

Amina Annabi shows off a magnificent pair of large breasts as a North African prostitute

Eric Vu-An shows his buns, as Winger's Bedouin lover

John Malkovich shows his penis and the top of his butt in a scene where he goes to Winger's bedside.

As Paul Bowles said when discussing his novel in a 1981 Paris Review interview: "Everyone is isolated from everyone else. The concept of society is like a cushion to protect us from the knowledge of that isolation .. a fiction that serves as an anaesthetic." This story is about removing this anesthetic, removing the societal and cultural anchors of our existence. Kit and Port hoped that removing those moorings could leave their spiritual essences. On the other hand, perhaps a person without any moorings, adrift, is simply insane.

When Port died, Kit went completely native and took up with a local Bedouin. At that point in the story, the audience is not supposed to know whether she had found her mind, or lost it. Neither, for that matter, did she. Her fascination with an exotic culture eventually turned into a nightmarish, transformative experience. Trapped with the nomads, she couldn't even communicate, and thus achieved her original desire, although perhaps not in the way she originally conceived. The only thing left of her in the desert, without America, without money, without language, without friends, was her essence, whatever that is.

Malkovich was an unusual casting choice as the doomed Port. Port is supposed to be a beautiful, spoiled, but sincere rich liberal kid who can't really relate to other people very well because he's too self-absorbed. You might easily picture Robert Redford in the role. Malkovich brings a creepy air of superiority to the part, and adds a mocking tone from the start. He was so condescending in his precious pseudo-intellectual babble about the distinction between an traveler and a tourist, for example, that when he became terminally ill, my reaction was, "what did you think would happen when you drank the local water, ate street food, and had casual sex with the local people? Weren't you committing suicide in the first place? You shouldn't be too surprised at your success." Malkovich can do a lot of things well, but innocence and sincerity are not among them. It seems to me that Malkovich and Winger, in general, were too world-weary and condescending for roles that would have played out better if portrayed as fragile innocents unable to understand the situation they were entering.

DVD info from Amazon

  • Theatrical trailer(s)

  • Behind-the-Scenes Featurette

  • All-New Digital Transfer

  • Widescreen anamorphic format, 1.85;1

Book info from Amazon

Bernardo Bertolucci made this film from an eponymous novel by Paul Bowles. Bowles himself does some narration on camera. Bowles actually wrote the book while living in North Africa in 1947, and Bertolucci actually filmed in North Africa. The details of place and time are not only accurate, but rendered spectacularly. Whatever else you may think of the movie, I promise that you will be impressed by the sights and sounds. It is a tremendous travelogue.

But maybe some books were never meant to be movies. Bertolucci could translate the visual experience to film, but their interior processes were not easy to convert to a watchable story.

Bertolucci was coming off The Last Emperor, which was nominated for nine Oscars and won every single one of them, eventually taking in $44 million at the box office as well. The Sheltering Sky was anticipated eagerly by his fans, only to disappear almost immediately amid half-hearted reviews and poor word of mouth. It grossed only $2 million dollars, and must have lost a fortune for everyone involved. 

TUNA's THOUGHTS

The Sheltering Sky (1990), according to director Bernardo Bertolucci, is a love story set in an exotic location. He goes on to say that it is about two people who love each other deeply, but somehow never seem to connect with each other.

I have a suggestion for the two. They no sooner arrive in Africa than he goes out and finds a hooker. Not long after, she beds their best friend. After hubby dies of stupidity (more about that later), she hitches a ride with a camel train, and shacks up with a local, until his wives drive her out. I don't see musical beds as a great strategy when your goal is to become close to your true love.

John Malkovich, as Porter Moresby, felt that he was enough like the character that he would just play himself. Debra Winger, as his wife Kit, worked on her character day and night. Old Port heads for the tent brothels his first night in town (I could just see his insurance company actuaries cringe). He ends up in the tent of the beautiful Amina Annabi. While they are conducting business, she hides his wallet under a pillow. He spots her, and sneaks it back without missing a stroke. Just when I was about to gain some respect for Port, he waves the wallet at her as he is leaving, and ends up running for his life. After this colossal bit of stupidity, it was little surprise that he drank the local water and died of typhus.

I suppose, if this is your kind of film, it is a technically competent look at some seldom-filmed locales. For me, it was the greatest cure for insomnia since Out of Africa. It was way too long, and did a poor job of portraying what was going on in the characters' minds, which was the entire point of the film. I would have tolerated it better 48 minutes shorter at 90 minutes, but I don't have a good argument against those who say it should have been 138 minutes shorter.

The Critics Vote

  • Ebert 2/4

The People Vote ...

  • with their dollars: it grossed $2 million. I don't know what the budget was, but it was a lot, and the movie must have lost a fortune.
IMDb guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of excellence, about like three and a half stars from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm watchability, about like two and a half stars from the critics. The fives are generally not worthwhile unless they are really your kind of material, about like two stars from the critics. Films under five are generally awful even if you like that kind of film, equivalent to about one and a half stars from the critics or less, depending on just how far below five the rating is.

My own guideline: A means the movie is so good it will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not good enough to win you over if you hate the genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an open mind about this type of film. C means it will only appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if you love the genre. F means that the film is not only unappealing across-the-board, but technically inept as well.

Based on this description, this film is a C+. Arty, philosophical movie from a book which is about interior processes. It looks and sounds magnificent. Most people will find it tedious, but if it sounds like your kind of movie, it is done superbly, including a lot of rare Debra Winger nudity. Ebert and other reviewers suggest following up the movie by reading the book, which many consider the best novel written by an Englishman since World War 2. (Tuna C+: With the genre being boring, tedious, arty epic love stories, this is a great example of that genre, and so is a C+.)

Return to the Movie House home page