Breaking and Entering

 (2007)

by Johnny Web (Uncle Scoopy; Greg Wroblewski)

We can never underestimate mankind's capacity for self-deception. In December of 2006 the Weinstein brothers rushed Breaking and Entering into one theater to create Oscar eligibility. You'd have to call that extreme optimism, in light of the fact that only 33% of the film's eventual reviews were positive. It never did reach more than 95 theaters, and never made the top thirty films in any given week. It grossed less than a million dollars in the USA. Did they really think this was going to pull in some award season hardware, or were they posturing? Hard to say. The Weinsteins have been able to work Oscar magic with mediocre films in the past (Cider House Rules, e.g.), and this film is not without virtues, so maybe they really believed it had a chance. It has a prestigious international cast, treats serious themes and was directed by Anthony Minghella (The English Patient,  Cold Mountain, The Talented Mr. Ripley). Above all, Breaking and Entering has a sense of its own importance and is full of gravitas.

Yup, as George Constanza might say, "it's full of it all right."

Jude Law plays an architect who is so dedicated to his goal of revitalizing decaying London neighborhoods that he actually moves his house and office into a newly-gentrifying community of immigrants. It doesn't work out. The office is soon burglarized twice - by the same people, it turns out. Fearing a third break-in and frustrated at the lack of action from the police, Jude stakes out his own office and soon spots the crook, a young boy who had fled with his mother from the former Yugoslavia during one ethnic cleansing or another.

The situation gets very complicated when Jude, who is frustrated and bored with his long-term relationship, gets into a physical relationship with the burglar's mother, played by Juliette Binoche with two facial expressions - "about to cry" and "staring with dead eyes." Come to think of it, those two facial expressions represent about 90% of Binoche's career, so I guess she was cast perfectly. The burglar's mother gets involved with Jude because she wants to protect her son, and is basically offering her body for Jude's silence, but he doesn't exactly understand what she is capable of doing for her son, or perhaps he doesn't want to understand it.

The four main characters (Jude, his live-in lover, the burglar and the burglar's mother) would probably have created enough emotional edge for any film, but the script gives Jude and his partner an emotionally-challenged daughter as well, and the family ties are further complicated because Jude is not the girl's biological father and he's not even married to the woman he's lived with for ten years (Robin Wright Penn). Then there are the issues involving Jude's business partner, the Serbian crooks, some cops, and a hooker with a heart of gold (Vera Farmiga). Farmiga basically plays the wise but world-weary hooker role with the stock Eastern European fortune teller accent, as handed down to her from the will of Anne Bancroft.

The film would have done well to get rid of several of those characters. Jude didn't really need to have a business partner at all, and the hooker could also have been dropped altogether. The daughter could have been eliminated or made into an unexceptional child. That would have left the film tighter, and would have left more time to develop the three key relationships which form the true emotional center of the film (Jude's relationship with the two women and the crook's relationship with his mother). The additional characters and themes were probably intended to add intellectual heft and social consciousness to the film, but served instead to divert the main flow of the film while creating a running time which was excessive for such an inward and lifeless film. It's "only" 123 minutes long, but seems like 123 hours.

There is some tremendous nudity in the film, but it is basically only accessible by freeze-frame. There is a scene where Binoche gets naked and crawls into bed with a sleeping Law, all to be photographed by her friend. (It's blackmail evidence, if necessary to secure his silence.) The stills show up later on Law's computer via e-mail, and we get a complete glimpse of what the scene must have looked like originally. While the moving images show only Binoche's breasts, and modestly at that, the still images show the full monty front and rear from Binoche, as well as Law's bum. Unfortunately, the computer screen is only visible for a few frames, the images are extremely small, and it's not possible to see the nudity without pausing.

(By the way, the DVD has several deleted and extended scenes, but there is not a longer version of that scene.)

DVD INFO

* widescreen anamorphic (film a/r 2.35)

* full-length commentary from director Minghella.

* six deleted or extended scenes.

 

 

THE CRITICS AND ACADEMIES

2 James Berardinelli (of 4 stars)
56 British Consensus  (of 100)
33 Rotten Tomatoes  (% positive)
56 Metacritic.com (of 100)

THE PEOPLE

   
6.5 IMDB summary (of 10)

IMDb's top 1000 voters call it a mediocre 5.7, which is about how I feel about it, but female voters score it 7.0

THE BOX OFFICE

Box Office Mojo. It never reached as many as 100 theaters and grossed less than a million dollars in the USA.

NUDITY REPORT

  • Juliette Binoche - breasts and the bottom of her bum in the film proper. Full frontal and rear nudity in the blackmail photos.
  • Vera Farmiga - breasts.
  • Jude Law - bum (in the still pictures only).

Google
 

Our Grade:

If you are not familiar with our grading system, you need to read the explanation, because the grading is not linear. For example, by our definition, a C is solid and a C+ is a VERY good movie. There are very few Bs and As. Based on our descriptive system, this film is a:

C-

If I followed our formula to a "T" the film probably should be graded a D or a D+ because it was a failure at the box office as well as with the critics, and I didn't like it myself. But I'm going to have to call it a C- based on the solid performances and the respectable 6.5 at IMDb (7.0 from women). Or maybe I got fooled by its earnest sense of self-importance. Either way, it obviously has some admirers, but it certainly gets no recommendation from me.